In what way did the second-grade teacher fail when discussing a student's Gifted and Talented testing?

The choice indicating a failure to follow ethical guidelines according to the Code of Ethics highlights a crucial aspect of professional accountability in education. When discussing a student's Gifted and Talented (GT) testing, a teacher is expected to maintain confidentiality and respect the student's dignity. The Code of Ethics emphasizes the importance of treating all students and their information with care, which includes how educators communicate about a student's abilities and testing outcomes.

Failing to adhere to these ethical guidelines could mean that the teacher disclosed sensitive information inappropriately, did not respect the student's privacy, or failed to engage in a manner that promotes trust and respect with the students and their families. By not following these ethical principles, the teacher may have negatively impacted the student's self-esteem and potentially their educational experience. Meanwhile, compliance with the other options typically involves administrative and legal standards rather than the nuanced interpersonal ethics that govern how teachers interact with students regarding personal and sensitive information.